Reviewing process
Stage 1
Articles must be sent in English language using this form.
Stage 2
The article sent for publishing will be accompanied by a short professional presentation of no more than 120 words which must contain complete contact details, including those necessary for technical correspondence (phone and fax).
Stage 3
The editor and assistant editors select the materials complying with the technical editing norms. The rest of the materials are eliminated from the reviewing process.
Stage 4
At least two members of the Editorial Council and the Scientific Council make an initial assessment of the scientific relevance of the article and nominate the reviewers to produce an informed opinion.
Stage 5
A double-blind peer review takes place, involving three reviewers (per article) with expertise in the specific domain that is being addressed.
Stage 6
Materials respecting the scientific standards are going on a waiting list for publication. Materials in need of further development for achieving the scientific rigor will be returned to the author for modifications. Materials that cannot achieve the minimum of scientific quality are rejected.
Stage 7
Materials are awaiting publication according their order on the publishing list.
The authors are responsible for clarifying the copyrights of the various information contained in the articles.