ECTAP
 
HomeDespre ECTAEventsPolitica editorialaTrimite un articolParteneri / link-uri utileArchiveAbonamentContact
 

ISSN 1841-8678   (print)
ISSN 1844-0029   (online)

News

Archive ECTAP

Note: for the period 1994-2003 the archive of the magazine will not be available online

Supplements ECTAP

If you cannot open the pdf file you need Adobe Reader.
download Adobe Reader

Creative Commons License

Theoretical and Applied Economics
No. 1 / 2026 (646), Spring

AI-simulated reciprocity and the narrowing of decision options within human attachment psychological architecture

Raluca Iuliana GEORGESCU
Bodislav & Associates, Romania
Dumitru Alexandru BODISLAV
Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania

Abstract. This paper examines how regular interaction with artificial intelligence systems that simulate reciprocal conversation may influence the cognitive structure of attachment-related decision-making. Drawing on attachment theory, behavioural economics, and social exchange theory, the study explores how AI-mediated interaction may gradually reshape the way individuals evaluate relational uncertainty, vulnerability, and commitment. The analysis identifies three structural mechanisms through which AI-simulated reciprocity may affect attachment-related decision processes: reward without vulnerability, synthetic reciprocity without agency, and the narrowing of perceived decision options. In human relationships, emotional validation and reciprocity are typically contingent upon vulnerability, negotiation, and effort, creating a probabilistic reward structure that sustains relational investment. AI systems, however, can provide immediate and consistent validation without requiring reciprocal emotional exposure or interpersonal cost. At the same time, AI interactions simulate responsiveness linguistically while lacking intentional agency or relational investment. Repeated exposure to these patterns may alter expectations regarding responsiveness, effort, and emotional regulation in human relationships. In addition, AI-generated guidance often frames relational problems through simplified and structured decision pathways, which behavioural research suggests can limit the range of alternatives cognitively considered by individuals. The paper argues that these mechanisms may collectively narrow the perceived decision space within the psychological architecture of attachment, potentially influencing how individuals interpret relational conflict, evaluate commitment, and tolerate ambiguity. The study does not claim that AI eliminates human attachment capacity; rather, it proposes that repeated exposure to structured AI interaction may recalibrate the evaluative conditions under which attachment-related decisions are formed.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, attachment theory, decision making, behavioural economics, social exchange theory.

Download the full article:  

Contents

Open acces

ECTAP

Search

BOOKS

The Economicity. The Epistemic Landscape, Marin Dinu, 2016

Partners


ISSN 1841-8678 (ediția print) / ISSN 1844-0029 (ediția online)
© Copyright Asociația Generală a Economiștilor din România / Editura Economică
Redacția: Oficiul poștal 18, Ghișeul 3 - Căsuța poștală 31, București 014820, E-mail: economia.ta@edeconomica.com

© 2006-2026 Theoretical and Applied Economics